## Hadron-Level Standalone

The Les Houches Accord allows external process-level configurations to be fed in, for subsequent parton-level and hadron-level generation to be handled internally by PYTHIA. There is no correspondingly standardized interface if you have external events that have also been generated through the parton-level stage, so that only the hadron-level remains to be handled. A non-standard way to achieve this exists, however, and can be useful both for real applications and for various tests of the hadronization model on its own.

The key trick is to set the flag `ProcessLevel:all = off`. When `pythia.next()` is called it then does not try to generate a hard process. Since there are no beams, it is also not possible to perform the normal `PartonLevel` step. (It is still possible to generate final-state radiation, but this is not automatic. It would have to be done by hand, using the `pythia.forceTimeShower(...)` method, before `pythia.next()` is called.) Thus only the `HadronLevel` methods are called, to take the current content of the event record stored in `pythia.event` as a starting point for any hadronization and decays that are allowed by the normal parameters of this step. Often the input would consist solely of partons grouped into colour singlets, but also (colour-singlet) particles are allowed.

To set up all the parameters, a `pythia.init()` call has to be used, without any arguments. In brief, the structure of the main program therefore should be something like

      Pythia pythia;                               // Declare generator.
      Event& event = pythia.event                  // Convenient shorthand.
      pythia.readString("ProcessLevel:all = off"); // The trick!
      pythia.init();                               // Initialization.
      for (int iEvent = 0; iEvent < nEvent; ++iEvent) {
        // Insert filling of event here!
        pythia.next();                             // Do the hadron level.
      }

Of course this should be supplemented by analysis of events, error checks, and so on, as for a normal PYTHIA run. The unique aspect is how to fill the `event` inside the loop, before `pythia.next()` is called.

### Input configuration

To set up a new configuration the first step is to throw away the current one, with `event.reset()`. This routine will also reserve the zeroth entry in the even record to represent the event as a whole.

With the `event.append(...)` methods a new entry is added at the bottom of the current record, i.e. the first time it is called entry number 1 is filled, and so on. The `append` method basically exists in four variants, either without or with history information, and with four-momentum provided either as a `Vec4` four-vector or as four individual components:

      append( id, status, col, acol, p, m)
      append( id, status, col, acol, px, py, pz, e, m)
      append( id, status, mother1, mother2, daughter1, daughter2, col, acol, p, m)
      append( id, status, mother1, mother2, daughter1, daughter2, col, acol, px, py, pz, e, m)

The methods return the index at which the entry has been stored, but normally you would not use this feature.

You can find descriptions of the input variables here. The PDG particle code `id` and the Les Houches Accord colour `col` and anticolour `acol` tags must be set correctly. The four-momentum and mass have to be provided in units of GeV; if you omit the mass it defaults to 0.

Outgoing particles that should hadronize should be given status code 23. Often this is the only status code you need. You could e.g. also fill in incoming partons with -21 and intermediate ones with -22, if you so wish. Usually the choice of status codes is not crucial, so long as you recall that positive numbers correspond to particles that are still around, while negative numbers denote ones that already hadronized or decayed. However, so as not to run into contradictions with the internal PYTHIA checks (when `Check:event = on`), or with external formats such as HepMC, we do recommend the above codes. When `pythia.next()` is called the positive-status particles that hadronize/decay get the sign of the status code flipped to negative but the absolute value is retained. The new particles are added with normal PYTHIA status codes.

For normal hadronization/decays in `pythia.next()` the history encoded in the mother and daughter indices is not used. Therefore the first two `append` methods, which set all these indices vanishing, should suffice. The subsequent hadronization/decays will still be properly documented.

The exception is when you want to include junctions in your string topology, i.e. have three string pieces meet. Then you must insert in your event record the (decayed) particle that is the reason for the presence of a junction, e.g. a baryon beam remnant from which several valence quarks have been kicked out, or a neutralino that underwent a baryon-number-violating decay. This particle must have as daughters the three partons that together carry the baryon number.

The sample program in `main21.cc` illustrates how you can work with this facility, both for simple parton configurations and for more complicated ones with junctions.

### Repeated hadronization or decay

An alternative approach is possible with the `pythia.forceHadronLevel()` routine. This method does a call to the `HadronLevel` methods, irrespective of the value of the `HadronLevel:all` flag. If you hadronize externally generated events it is equivalent to a `pythia.next()` call with `ProcessLevel:all = off`.

The similarity of names indicates that `pythia.forceTimeShower( int iBeg, int iEnd, double pTmax, int nBranchMax = 0)` is intended to belong to the same set of work-by-hand methods. Here `iBeg` and `iEnd` give the range of partons that should be allowed to shower, `pTmax` the maximum pT scale of emissions, and a nonzero `nBranchMax` a maximum number of allowed branchings. Additionally, a `scale` has to be set for each parton that should shower, which requires an additional final argument to the `append` methods above. This scale limits the maximum pT allowed for each parton, in addition to the global `pTmax`. When not set the scale defaults to 0, meaning no radiation for that parton.

The real application instead is for repeated hadronization of the same PYTHIA process- and parton-level event. This may for some studies help to save time, given that these two first step are more time-consuming than the hadronization one.

For repeated hadronization you should first generate an event as usual, but with `HadronLevel:all = off`. This event you can save in a temporary copy, e.g. `Event savedEvent = pythia.event`. Inside a loop you copy back with `pythia.event = savedEvent`, and call `pythia.forceHadronLevel()` to obtain a new hadronization history.

A more limited form of repetition is if you want to decay a given kind of particle repeatedly, without having to generate the rest of the event anew. This could be the case e.g. in B physics applications. Then you can use the `pythia.moreDecays()` method, which decays all particles in the event record that have not been decayed but should have been done so. The `pythia.particleData.mayDecay( id, false/true)` method may be used to switch off/on the decays of a particle species `id`, so that it is not decayed in the `pythia.next()` call but only inside a loop over a number of tries.

Between each loop the newly produced decay products must be removed and the decayed particle status restored to undecayed. The former is simple, since the new products are appended to the end of the event record: `event.saveSize()` saves the initial size of the event record, and `event.restoreSize()` can later be used repeatedly to restore this original size, which means that the new particles at the end are thrown away. The latter is more complicated, and requires the user to identify the positions of all particles of the species and restore a positive status code with `event[i].statusPos()`.

The `main15.cc` program illustrates both these methods, i.e. either repeated hadronization or repeated decay of PYTHIA events.